
I have kinda been avoiding IE7 for the previous betas simply due to the tight integration with Windows Update and all the nasty WGA stuff. But since it is due to be released ‘this summer’, and after having read this post about the IE7 release…I figured it was probably time to see actually how much work it will cause me to do and how much stuff it will not work with.
So, I fired up virtual pc (hah! you think I would install it on my main box?) and downloaded a copy of IE7 beta3 from here and ran the installer. First impressions, mmm…windows blue installer, next, next, ok, next, ‘the installer wants to validate this copy of windows’…whatever!, next, next, install…ahh, it would seem microsoft have decided to do away with the pesky progress indicator and replace it with a meaningless xp-startup style knightrider effect. I assume to show windows hasn’t crashed yet, but deliberately not to show how much longer the process will take. Is this because they don’t know how much stuff is going to be installed? perhaps it is only because the software is beta, they will wrap it up at the end…I hope. After quite some time of ‘essential updates’, ‘installing core components’ and whatnot we are finally at the restart your computer screen…
After restarting, I open it up by clicking the spiffy new icon and am immediately taken of and bounced around microsoft.com, msn.com etc…finally ending up at a configuration page allowing me to enable phishing validation and all sorts of other ‘protect me from the internet’ style options. The phishing validation seems to be something IE7 is quite proud of, it sends a url to microsoft which decides whether it is safe or not…hmm, not a wholly bad plan…but I am not sure about microsoft making the decision for me, I think I will leave it disabled for now.
Looking at the screen in-front of me, something is wrong…something is missing, ahh…the ‘file’, ‘edit’, ‘view’…menus are missing…oh no…they have just moved them from the expected top-left, to bottom-right…how handy. I guess most IE users probably don’t use them anyway. Luckily in the (bottom-right) Tools menu, I found it can be turned back on, except it appears below the address bar, instead of above it…now I have 2 ‘tools’ menus, with slightly different menu items inside…although the first few options are the same just to add a little more confusion. Someone didn’t quite think that one through too well…
hey look…tabs, thank god for that…they are all chunky and rounded. The interface for them is quite nice though, a new tab is signified by just a little bit of a tab to the right…which I like. The close button is a little ‘x’ on the tab itself, safari style, (and an essential extension for firefox). My only gripes are the rather naff looking blue sonar loading icon, but that is pretty inconsequential and that none of my favicons seems to be appearing, I guess they must have changed something, bah!. After opening a new tab, there is a nice microsoft explanation about what tabs are and why they are worth using, which I dare say most users will never remove. Also appearing when I open more than one tab is a ‘thumbnail’ button, sort of an expose-style page showing the contents of all your tabs…nice.
Windows Live appears to be the default search engine…and…hey, what a surprise…they offer no other packaged options for searching. Although it was pretty easy to install Google from the installation site, it would have been nice to have the option from the start…I guess Live search will be taking a slightly bigger slice of the search market in the future…I don’t have a massive problem with that, as my sculpture site is ranked #1 for ‘sculpture‘ as a search
The rss integration is quite nice, I certainly think it will begin to make rss a little more accessible to the non-techie…also it is now called ‘feeds’ rather than rss, probably a good thing to make it look a little less geeky. When you press the feed icon, you are whisked off to a safari style feed template, certainly better than raw xml…
There are now Internet Explorer ‘add-ons’ to rival firefox’s extensions…I doubt they will have the same range of innovation in the short-term (probably not in the long-term either), at the moment they are things like: auto-complete forms, offline browsers and flash players…the sikly-sweet stock photography on these pages made me want to wretch too.
There is also a ‘zoom-in’, ‘zoom-out’ button in the bottom-right to scale the page, (images and all) opera-style, this is something firefox has needed for sometime. It means that I can view big pages (even big pages with liquid layouts) on my little 800×600 virtual pc screen…again, thats kinda nice…
All in all, IE7 (or Windows Internet Explorer as it is now dubbed) seems like a pretty good update to IE6. They have clearly given it quite a bit of thought as to the interface and targeted it specifically at the non-tech who (most-likely)isn’t totally clear on what a browser is, let alone why they should get a new one. It doesn’t really offer anything especially new over the current competition, however it does wrap up some of the nicer features in opera (page-scaling), firefox (tabs, extensions) and safari (rss skinning) into one browser, considering it has been over half-a-decade since the last iteration of IE one would expect this.
It seems to run a little slower than IE6, which is not surprising although it is a difficult call for me to make as I am running it through a virtual pc. As well as the fact that speed refinement is usually last to be done in the software dev process.
Most importantly, So far there are only the most minor changes which need to be done with regards to it’s page rendering engine…it doesn’t drastically screw-up any of my pages, at least no more than IE6, which I am a little surprised about.
Would I switch from Firefox to IE7? No chance in hell…I don’t like to be talked-down to in a browser, I like the non-fisher-price buttons in firefox and there is no way IE7 could have the range of techie extensions which I currently use…oh, and I like having the same browser (with sync’ed bookmarks and similar functionality) on PC and Mac. Are we expecting a mac version of IE7?..doubt it…
Would I recommend IE7 to a non-tech user over Firefox? Now thats a difficult question…It would very much depend on whether it was a non-tech user who wanted to learn, or whether it was a non-tech user who gets angry at having to learn…the former I would probably suggest they enjoy the benefits of firefox, and join the movement to which it stands. The latter would probably prefer a little more cotton-wool between them and the web, so IE7 would be the best-bet. This is a pretty significant change from what I would have said yesterday…the new IE has impressed me…